In his article "Globalization of Culture
Through the Media", Kraidy (2002) discusses the effect of cultural
imperialism from Western powers and its resultant effect that sparked a debate
on the topic of biased international media flow. He also examines the evolution of cultural imperialisation by globalization in order to capture
the complexity of the transnational transactions.
He then gives an alternative perspective of culture through hybridization,
where mediation is provided while cultures mix with a globalized mindset.
I agree with Kraidy on the massive influence that cultural
imperialism from Western powers has placed on the world. The example that he
has given in his article about the spread of Western lifestyle allowed me to
reflect on our society in Singapore and how this spread of Western culture can
be seen in almost every aspect of our lives, be it food, fashion, forms of
entertainment, or most significantly, the common langauge that we speak-- the
English language.
However, with that being said, the point that I have the most
consensus with is his view on hybridization as a form of globalization.
Globalization is indeed a better view of the world than cultural
imperialisation. I agree that it is able to capture the intricacy of this
perspective more thoroughly as it provides a wider view with “less coherence
and direction”. Our world is no longer influenced by just the Western culture.
An influx of non-western cultures has been placing their significance world
wide and the two most prominent cultures would be the Korean “K-pop” culture
and the Japanese soft culture.
In my opinion, the
most apt example of hybridization (a product of mixed tradition and cultural
forms) would be Singapore’s society. Our society entails the “three main
features of cultural hybridity” as mentioned by Kraidy (2002): (1) “mixing previously
separate cultural systems”, (2) “deterritorializing cultural processes from their original
physical environment to new and foreign contexts”, and (3) accomodating “impure
cultural genres that are formed out of the mixture of several cultural domains”.
It is not uncommon to know that the society that we are living in is
everchanging. However, with a growing number of foreigners each bringing in
their own culture, Singapore, our multiracial country is becoming even more
hybridized.Therefore, I agree to a large extent that media has “intensified the
hybridity that is already in existence in cultures across the globe”.
Edited: 20/2/2014
Hi Wei Qin!
ReplyDeleteEugene and i felt that rather than being replaced by cultural globalisation, Kraidy suggests that cultural imperialism evolved into cultural globalisation. We also felt that you could specify the form "mediation" that facilitated cultural mixing.
That aside, we felt that the examples you brought up were really relevant to us. We could understand where you were coming from. One minor grammar mistake we spotted is "Korean" should be capitalised.