In his article
"Globalization of Culture Through the Media", Kraidy (2002) discusses
the effect of cultural imperialism from Western powers and its resultant effect
that sparked a debate on the topic of biased international media flow. He also examines
the evolution of cultural imperialisation by globalization in order to capture
the complexity of the transnational transactions. He
then gives an alternative perspective of culture through hybridization, where
mediation is provided while cultures mix with a globalized mindset.
Cultural imperialism from
Western powers has placed tremendous influence on the world.The example that
Kraidy has given in his article about the spread of Western lifestyle allowed
me to reflect on our society in Singapore and how this spread of Western
culture can be seen in almost every aspect of our lives, be it food, fashion,
forms of entertainment, or most significantly, the common langauge that we
speak-- the English language.
However, with that being
said, one point that I have the most consensus with is his view on
hybridization as a form of globalization. Our world is no longer influenced by
just the Western culture. An influx of non-western cultures has been placing
their significance world wide. A well-known example would be the the Korean
popular culture. The export capacity of Korean popular culture has grown so
much wider in recent years, gaining enough recognization in Southeast Asian
countries to form a ‘Korean wave’ (Shim, 2012).
In my opinion, another apt example of hybridization
would be Singapore’s society. Hybridization refers to “existing practices being
separated and recombined with new practices” (Pieterse, 1993). Being a
multi-cultural society, Singapore entails the “main features of cultural
hybridity” as mentioned by Kraidy (2002). This includes mixing of cultural
systems, forming of new contexts, and accomodating “impure genres of domains
from different cultures” (Kraidy, 2002). With a growing number of foreigners
each bringing in their own culture, as well as the ease of accessing multi
media platforms, our multiracial country is becoming even more hybridized. Therefore,
I agree to a large extent that media has “intensified the hybridity that is
already in existence in cultures across the globe”. Also, hybridization
most certainly did not result in a “homogenity force” in our society,
consistent with the view of Kraidy (2002).
(372 words)
References
Kraidy, M. M. (2002). Globalization of Culture Through the Media. Retrieved from http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1333&context=asc_papers
Pieterse, J. N. (1993). Globalization as Hibridization. Working Paper Series, 152, 1-18.
Shim, D. (2012). Hybridity and the rise of Korean popular
culture in Asia. Media Culture Society,
28 (1), 25-44.